![\"Attendance](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/grafik1-eng1.jpg\" "\\"Attendance")
Brainstorming, as a meeting format, is also highly rated for its efficiency. The survey was participated by companies and organizations in Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Croatia.
\nAs the most efficient event formats, workshops and trainings are number one, with 45% and 25% respectively. Seminars account for 10%, while panels, B2B meetings, brainstorming and simulation make up 5% each of the respondent answers.
\nBased on the respondent answers, as showed in the graph, we observe that the highest attendance is at\u00a0trainings and workshops, and the lowest at panels.
\nTraditional lectures and brainstorming also have a high share, almost 70% if we look at the summary percentage of those attending these events occasionally and often.
\nTrainings and workshops are definitely ahead in efficiency, rated by the respondents as very efficient – 90%, and efficient – 10%.
\nThere is no record of their inefficiency, with only an emphasis on importance to have high-quality lecturers, and the opinion that performance at a training or workshop is more efficient the smaller the group is.
\nBrainstorming as an event format is also rated as highly efficient, in particular where the goal is to come up with new ideas or solutions to problems.
\nPanel discussions are averagely rated as partly efficient, with an emphasis on importance to have a good moderator.
\nIn the case of a panel, we observe the widest range of ratings (highly efficient (33%), efficient (20%) and partly efficient (42%), as well as a small percentage (5%) of inefficient).
\nObviously, experiences in panels are most variable, leading to the conclusion that there is no problem with the panel as an event format.
\nThe overall experience at a panel discussion actually depends on the moderator and panellists differing from one panel to another, therefore the most different experiences in this type of event format.
\n![\"Efficiency](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/grafik2-eng.jpg\" "\\"Efficiency")
Traditional lectures remain deprived of the highly efficient rating.
\nThey are averagely rated as partly efficient (65%), depending on the topic and lecturer.
\nTraditional lectures also have the highest percentage of inefficiency rating (11%), with the opinion that they are inefficient, obsolete and dull.
\nThe respondents pointed out to some other formats they find very good, as follows: working & sports meetings or educational & recreational meetings, informal gatherings of people of same professions and exchange of opinions (on an occasion), as well as targeted B2B meetings.
\nThe conclusion is next: every meeting format has positive, but also negative sides. Some are more popular and efficient than others, but that doesn\u2019t mean that there is only one right solution.
\nBe aware of good and potential bad sides of each format, try to prevent usually failings, know your audience well, so as meeting goals, and you will choose just the right format for your event.
\n![\"research\"](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/anketaeng.jpg\")
The post PICK THE RIGHT FORMAT FOR YOUR EVENT appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.
\n", "content_text": "Trainings and workshops are considered the most efficient format for educational events, according to the research conducted by SEEbtm magazine in the second half of 2014.\nBrainstorming, as a meeting format, is also highly rated for its efficiency. The survey was participated by companies and organizations in Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Croatia.\nAs the most efficient event formats, workshops and trainings are number one, with 45% and 25% respectively. Seminars account for 10%, while panels, B2B meetings, brainstorming and simulation make up 5% each of the respondent answers.\nBased on the respondent answers, as showed in the graph, we observe that the highest attendance is at\u00a0trainings and workshops, and the lowest at panels.\nTraditional lectures and brainstorming also have a high share, almost 70% if we look at the summary percentage of those attending these events occasionally and often.\nTrainings and workshops are definitely ahead in efficiency, rated by the respondents as very efficient – 90%, and efficient – 10%.\nThere is no record of their inefficiency, with only an emphasis on importance to have high-quality lecturers, and the opinion that performance at a training or workshop is more efficient the smaller the group is.\nBrainstorming as an event format is also rated as highly efficient, in particular where the goal is to come up with new ideas or solutions to problems.\nAttendance of certain event formats\nPanel discussions are averagely rated as partly efficient, with an emphasis on importance to have a good moderator.\nIn the case of a panel, we observe the widest range of ratings (highly efficient (33%), efficient (20%) and partly efficient (42%), as well as a small percentage (5%) of inefficient).\nObviously, experiences in panels are most variable, leading to the conclusion that there is no problem with the panel as an event format.\nThe overall experience at a panel discussion actually depends on the moderator and panellists differing from one panel to another, therefore the most different experiences in this type of event format.\nEfficiency of certain event formats\nTraditional lectures remain deprived of the highly efficient rating.\nThey are averagely rated as partly efficient (65%), depending on the topic and lecturer.\nTraditional lectures also have the highest percentage of inefficiency rating (11%), with the opinion that they are inefficient, obsolete and dull.\nThe respondents pointed out to some other formats they find very good, as follows: working & sports meetings or educational & recreational meetings, informal gatherings of people of same professions and exchange of opinions (on an occasion), as well as targeted B2B meetings.\nSimulation (of negotiations, a future event, a building design, driving, etc.) is a very interactive and efficient format, given that following introductory instructions it requires the continued involvement of participants and allows the study of actual processes under experimental conditions.\nThe conclusion is next: every meeting format has positive, but also negative sides. Some are more popular and efficient than others, but that doesn\u2019t mean that there is only one right solution.\nBe aware of good and potential bad sides of each format, try to prevent usually failings, know your audience well, so as meeting goals, and you will choose just the right format for your event.\n\n\nMiona Milic\nThe post PICK THE RIGHT FORMAT FOR YOUR EVENT appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.", "date_published": "2014-11-26T11:44:00+01:00", "date_modified": "2018-01-04T09:42:12+01:00", "author": { "name": "Miona Milic", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/author/miona/", "avatar": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG-20240224-WA0003-e1728981138373.jpg" }, "image": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/bigstock-Group-of-Multiethnic-Busy-Peop-66058582.jpg", "tags": [ "brainstorming", "event", "event format", "panel", "pick", "trainings", "workshop", "RESEARCH", "Statistics" ] }, { "id": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/what-are-the-problems-with-panel-discussions/", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/what-are-the-problems-with-panel-discussions/", "title": "WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS?", "content_html": "The research focuses on the question how effective panel discussions are and points out the most frequent comments and remarks of the participants.
\n![\"How](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/how-effective-is-the-panel.png\" "\\"How")
According to the research, 99% of event participants, during the period of previous 12 months, attended some panel discussion.
\nOut of them, 63% says that panel discussions are hardly \u201cok\u201d, poor and very poor. However, the rest of 37% says that the panels were very good, even great.
\nThat fact, according to the author of the report, Kristin Arnold, shows that the very form is not necessarily poor, but what needs to be done is to improve preparation and performance of panel discussions.
\nThe majority of subjects (72%), when listing the causes of dissatisfaction with panels, indicate to the problem with moderators, including insufficient preparedness, too long introductions, omissions in terms of asking good questions, too much talking, self-promotion, poor control of discussions among panelists and poor time management.
\nAlso, some panelists and moderators are not selected exclusively on the basis of their competence, talents, presentation skills or charisma, but, as Arnold states, on purely political grounds.
\nTaking into account the established high degree of correlation between moderators\u2019 effectiveness and the overall performance of panel discussion, Arnold says that this information is not surprising at all, and points out: \u201cWhen you have an excellent moderator, you will most likely have an excellent panel. Poor moderator = poor panel.\u201d
\nSignificant remarks concern the panelists (66% of respondents indicated to this problem), in terms that there are either too many of them, or they stray away from the main topic, they use the opportunity to make self-promotion or promotion of their own products and services, they do not listen to the questions they are asked or their interlocutors.
\nProblems with panel topics, as said by 54% of respondents, usually concern broadness \u2013 topics are too broad, there is not enough material.
\nOther remarks are related to A/V elements \u2013 either too much or not enough; what they also mention is the lack of audience engagement as well as the lack of focus on the audience.
\n![\"9](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/9-top-remarks-concerning-panel-discussion.png\" "\\"9")
\u00b7 Moderation is the key.
\nSelect skilled moderator, ask for recommendations and testimonials. The success (or failure) of the panel depends on it.
\n\u00b7 Choose an interesting topic and spice it up.
\nThe topic should be of interest to the intended audience. Entertain them as well. Make the topic fun, trendy and interesting.
\n\u00b7 Select 3-4 DEEP panelists.
\nSelect interesting panelists who are \u201cDEEP\u201d:
\nDiverse: they have different points of view and represent the diversity in the audience.
\nExperienced: they are experts and practitioners who are knowledgeable in the topic area.
\nEloquent: they are able to express their ideas well in a public forum.
\nPrepared: they are willing to do the preparation in support of the audience and the promise.
\n\u00b7 Encourage preparation.
\nThe moderator and panelists have to do more than just \u201cshow up.\u201d Before the event, the moderator should finalize the format and agenda, write the welcome and introductions and key questions, confirm the details with the panelists.
\nThey should also formulate their key messages and develop short stories or anecdotes that illuminate their points. They can also research their fellow panelists to get to know their background, credentials and opinions on the subject so they can jump right in to a lively discussion.
\n\u00b7 Make it a conversation.
\n![\"Bored](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/bored-audience.jpg\" "\\"Bored")
The panel should NOT be a series of presentations, but a lively and informational discussion among smart people sharing their views for the ultimate benefit of the audience.
\n\u00b7 Engage and involve the audience.
\nYou don\u2019t have to wait until the formal Q&A at the end to get them engaged! Engage the audience before, during and after session by using polling technology and social media.
\n\u00b7 Get rid of the long, draped table.
\n\u00b7 When it comes to moderators, he can be a \u201cshe\u201d!
\nBased on this report, one can come to simple conclusion \u2013 for successful panel discussions, only choose an excellent moderator and interesting, competent panelists.
\nThe post WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS? appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.
\n", "content_text": "During 2014, Quality Process Consultants conducted research \u201cThe 2014 Panel Report\u201d, of which the author is Kristin Arnold.\nThe research focuses on the question how effective panel discussions are and points out the most frequent comments and remarks of the participants.\nHow effective is the panel?\nAccording to the research, 99% of event participants, during the period of previous 12 months, attended some panel discussion.\nOut of them, 63% says that panel discussions are hardly \u201cok\u201d, poor and very poor. However, the rest of 37% says that the panels were very good, even great.\nThat fact, according to the author of the report, Kristin Arnold, shows that the very form is not necessarily poor, but what needs to be done is to improve preparation and performance of panel discussions.\nThe majority of subjects (72%), when listing the causes of dissatisfaction with panels, indicate to the problem with moderators, including insufficient preparedness, too long introductions, omissions in terms of asking good questions, too much talking, self-promotion, poor control of discussions among panelists and poor time management.\nAlso, some panelists and moderators are not selected exclusively on the basis of their competence, talents, presentation skills or charisma, but, as Arnold states, on purely political grounds.\nThe biggest panel issues:\n \u00b7 Moderator issues\n \u00b7 \u201cOut of control\u201d panelists\n \u00b7 Topic problems\n \u00b7 Poor panelist selection\n \u00b7 Audio/Visuals\nTaking into account the established high degree of correlation between moderators\u2019 effectiveness and the overall performance of panel discussion, Arnold says that this information is not surprising at all, and points out: \u201cWhen you have an excellent moderator, you will most likely have an excellent panel. Poor moderator = poor panel.\u201d\nSignificant remarks concern the panelists (66% of respondents indicated to this problem), in terms that there are either too many of them, or they stray away from the main topic, they use the opportunity to make self-promotion or promotion of their own products and services, they do not listen to the questions they are asked or their interlocutors.\nProblems with panel topics, as said by 54% of respondents, usually concern broadness \u2013 topics are too broad, there is not enough material.\nOther remarks are related to A/V elements \u2013 either too much or not enough; what they also mention is the lack of audience engagement as well as the lack of focus on the audience.\n9 top remarks concerning panel discussion\nTips for great panels\n\u00b7 Moderation is the key.\nSelect skilled moderator, ask for recommendations and testimonials. The success (or failure) of the panel depends on it.\n\u00b7 Choose an interesting topic and spice it up.\nThe topic should be of interest to the intended audience. Entertain them as well. Make the topic fun, trendy and interesting.\n\u00b7 Select 3-4 DEEP panelists.\nSelect interesting panelists who are \u201cDEEP\u201d:\nA panel consists of a facilitated discussion among several thought leaders within a company and/or industry in front of an audience for 45-90 minutes.\nDiverse: they have different points of view and represent the diversity in the audience.\nExperienced: they are experts and practitioners who are knowledgeable in the topic area.\nEloquent: they are able to express their ideas well in a public forum.\nPrepared: they are willing to do the preparation in support of the audience and the promise.\n\u00b7 Encourage preparation.\nThe moderator and panelists have to do more than just \u201cshow up.\u201d Before the event, the moderator should finalize the format and agenda, write the welcome and introductions and key questions, confirm the details with the panelists.\nThey should also formulate their key messages and develop short stories or anecdotes that illuminate their points. They can also research their fellow panelists to get to know their background, credentials and opinions on the subject so they can jump right in to a lively discussion.\n\u00b7 Make it a conversation.\nBored audience\nThe panel should NOT be a series of presentations, but a lively and informational discussion among smart people sharing their views for the ultimate benefit of the audience.\n\u00b7 Engage and involve the audience.\nYou don\u2019t have to wait until the formal Q&A at the end to get them engaged! Engage the audience before, during and after session by using polling technology and social media.\n\u00b7 Get rid of the long, draped table.\n\u00b7 When it comes to moderators, he can be a \u201cshe\u201d!\nBased on this report, one can come to simple conclusion \u2013 for successful panel discussions, only choose an excellent moderator and interesting, competent panelists.\nThe post WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS? appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.", "date_published": "2014-11-14T12:51:19+01:00", "date_modified": "2018-01-04T10:00:57+01:00", "author": { "name": "Miona Milic", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/author/miona/", "avatar": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG-20240224-WA0003-e1728981138373.jpg" }, "image": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/bigstock-Bored-businessman-with-colleag-47210035.jpg", "tags": [ "panel", "panel discussion", "Tips for great panels", "RESEARCH", "Statistics" ] } ] }