![\"How](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/how-effective-is-the-panel.png\" "\\"How")
The post PANEL DISCUSSION appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.
\n", "content_text": "Panel discussion represents a situation in which a group of people is gathered in order to discuss an issue, often to provide feedback on something,\u00a0to brainstorm solutions to a problem or to discuss an issue of public concern in front of an audience.\nThe post PANEL DISCUSSION appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.", "date_published": "2014-12-22T09:53:59+01:00", "date_modified": "2017-12-21T15:53:08+01:00", "author": { "name": "Mirjana Novitovic", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/author/officebs/", "avatar": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/slika-.jpg" }, "image": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/Panel-diskusija.jpg", "tags": [ "panel discussion", "Term Dictionary" ] }, { "id": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/what-are-the-problems-with-panel-discussions/", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/what-are-the-problems-with-panel-discussions/", "title": "WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS?", "content_html": "The research focuses on the question how effective panel discussions are and points out the most frequent comments and remarks of the participants.
\nAccording to the research, 99% of event participants, during the period of previous 12 months, attended some panel discussion.
\nOut of them, 63% says that panel discussions are hardly \u201cok\u201d, poor and very poor. However, the rest of 37% says that the panels were very good, even great.
\nThat fact, according to the author of the report, Kristin Arnold, shows that the very form is not necessarily poor, but what needs to be done is to improve preparation and performance of panel discussions.
\nThe majority of subjects (72%), when listing the causes of dissatisfaction with panels, indicate to the problem with moderators, including insufficient preparedness, too long introductions, omissions in terms of asking good questions, too much talking, self-promotion, poor control of discussions among panelists and poor time management.
\nAlso, some panelists and moderators are not selected exclusively on the basis of their competence, talents, presentation skills or charisma, but, as Arnold states, on purely political grounds.
\nTaking into account the established high degree of correlation between moderators\u2019 effectiveness and the overall performance of panel discussion, Arnold says that this information is not surprising at all, and points out: \u201cWhen you have an excellent moderator, you will most likely have an excellent panel. Poor moderator = poor panel.\u201d
\nSignificant remarks concern the panelists (66% of respondents indicated to this problem), in terms that there are either too many of them, or they stray away from the main topic, they use the opportunity to make self-promotion or promotion of their own products and services, they do not listen to the questions they are asked or their interlocutors.
\nProblems with panel topics, as said by 54% of respondents, usually concern broadness \u2013 topics are too broad, there is not enough material.
\nOther remarks are related to A/V elements \u2013 either too much or not enough; what they also mention is the lack of audience engagement as well as the lack of focus on the audience.
\n![\"9](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/9-top-remarks-concerning-panel-discussion.png\" "\\"9")
\u00b7 Moderation is the key.
\nSelect skilled moderator, ask for recommendations and testimonials. The success (or failure) of the panel depends on it.
\n\u00b7 Choose an interesting topic and spice it up.
\nThe topic should be of interest to the intended audience. Entertain them as well. Make the topic fun, trendy and interesting.
\n\u00b7 Select 3-4 DEEP panelists.
\nSelect interesting panelists who are \u201cDEEP\u201d:
\nDiverse: they have different points of view and represent the diversity in the audience.
\nExperienced: they are experts and practitioners who are knowledgeable in the topic area.
\nEloquent: they are able to express their ideas well in a public forum.
\nPrepared: they are willing to do the preparation in support of the audience and the promise.
\n\u00b7 Encourage preparation.
\nThe moderator and panelists have to do more than just \u201cshow up.\u201d Before the event, the moderator should finalize the format and agenda, write the welcome and introductions and key questions, confirm the details with the panelists.
\nThey should also formulate their key messages and develop short stories or anecdotes that illuminate their points. They can also research their fellow panelists to get to know their background, credentials and opinions on the subject so they can jump right in to a lively discussion.
\n\u00b7 Make it a conversation.
\n![\"Bored](\"https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/bored-audience.jpg\" "\\"Bored")
The panel should NOT be a series of presentations, but a lively and informational discussion among smart people sharing their views for the ultimate benefit of the audience.
\n\u00b7 Engage and involve the audience.
\nYou don\u2019t have to wait until the formal Q&A at the end to get them engaged! Engage the audience before, during and after session by using polling technology and social media.
\n\u00b7 Get rid of the long, draped table.
\n\u00b7 When it comes to moderators, he can be a \u201cshe\u201d!
\nBased on this report, one can come to simple conclusion \u2013 for successful panel discussions, only choose an excellent moderator and interesting, competent panelists.
\nThe post WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS? appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.
\n", "content_text": "During 2014, Quality Process Consultants conducted research \u201cThe 2014 Panel Report\u201d, of which the author is Kristin Arnold.\nThe research focuses on the question how effective panel discussions are and points out the most frequent comments and remarks of the participants.\nHow effective is the panel?\nAccording to the research, 99% of event participants, during the period of previous 12 months, attended some panel discussion.\nOut of them, 63% says that panel discussions are hardly \u201cok\u201d, poor and very poor. However, the rest of 37% says that the panels were very good, even great.\nThat fact, according to the author of the report, Kristin Arnold, shows that the very form is not necessarily poor, but what needs to be done is to improve preparation and performance of panel discussions.\nThe majority of subjects (72%), when listing the causes of dissatisfaction with panels, indicate to the problem with moderators, including insufficient preparedness, too long introductions, omissions in terms of asking good questions, too much talking, self-promotion, poor control of discussions among panelists and poor time management.\nAlso, some panelists and moderators are not selected exclusively on the basis of their competence, talents, presentation skills or charisma, but, as Arnold states, on purely political grounds.\nThe biggest panel issues:\n \u00b7 Moderator issues\n \u00b7 \u201cOut of control\u201d panelists\n \u00b7 Topic problems\n \u00b7 Poor panelist selection\n \u00b7 Audio/Visuals\nTaking into account the established high degree of correlation between moderators\u2019 effectiveness and the overall performance of panel discussion, Arnold says that this information is not surprising at all, and points out: \u201cWhen you have an excellent moderator, you will most likely have an excellent panel. Poor moderator = poor panel.\u201d\nSignificant remarks concern the panelists (66% of respondents indicated to this problem), in terms that there are either too many of them, or they stray away from the main topic, they use the opportunity to make self-promotion or promotion of their own products and services, they do not listen to the questions they are asked or their interlocutors.\nProblems with panel topics, as said by 54% of respondents, usually concern broadness \u2013 topics are too broad, there is not enough material.\nOther remarks are related to A/V elements \u2013 either too much or not enough; what they also mention is the lack of audience engagement as well as the lack of focus on the audience.\n9 top remarks concerning panel discussion\nTips for great panels\n\u00b7 Moderation is the key.\nSelect skilled moderator, ask for recommendations and testimonials. The success (or failure) of the panel depends on it.\n\u00b7 Choose an interesting topic and spice it up.\nThe topic should be of interest to the intended audience. Entertain them as well. Make the topic fun, trendy and interesting.\n\u00b7 Select 3-4 DEEP panelists.\nSelect interesting panelists who are \u201cDEEP\u201d:\nA panel consists of a facilitated discussion among several thought leaders within a company and/or industry in front of an audience for 45-90 minutes.\nDiverse: they have different points of view and represent the diversity in the audience.\nExperienced: they are experts and practitioners who are knowledgeable in the topic area.\nEloquent: they are able to express their ideas well in a public forum.\nPrepared: they are willing to do the preparation in support of the audience and the promise.\n\u00b7 Encourage preparation.\nThe moderator and panelists have to do more than just \u201cshow up.\u201d Before the event, the moderator should finalize the format and agenda, write the welcome and introductions and key questions, confirm the details with the panelists.\nThey should also formulate their key messages and develop short stories or anecdotes that illuminate their points. They can also research their fellow panelists to get to know their background, credentials and opinions on the subject so they can jump right in to a lively discussion.\n\u00b7 Make it a conversation.\nBored audience\nThe panel should NOT be a series of presentations, but a lively and informational discussion among smart people sharing their views for the ultimate benefit of the audience.\n\u00b7 Engage and involve the audience.\nYou don\u2019t have to wait until the formal Q&A at the end to get them engaged! Engage the audience before, during and after session by using polling technology and social media.\n\u00b7 Get rid of the long, draped table.\n\u00b7 When it comes to moderators, he can be a \u201cshe\u201d!\nBased on this report, one can come to simple conclusion \u2013 for successful panel discussions, only choose an excellent moderator and interesting, competent panelists.\nThe post WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH PANEL DISCUSSIONS? appeared first on SEE Business travel & meetings magazine.", "date_published": "2014-11-14T12:51:19+01:00", "date_modified": "2018-01-04T10:00:57+01:00", "author": { "name": "Miona Milic", "url": "https://www.seebtm.com/en/author/miona/", "avatar": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG-20240224-WA0003-e1728981138373.jpg" }, "image": "https://www.seebtm.com/wp-content/uploads/bigstock-Bored-businessman-with-colleag-47210035.jpg", "tags": [ "panel", "panel discussion", "Tips for great panels", "RESEARCH", "Statistics" ] } ] }